STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA vs ISRAIL — LPA/1803/2017
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011345692017
Next Hearing
07th January 2019
Filing Number
LPA/1803/2017
Filing Date
16-09-2017
Registration No
LPA/1803/2017
Registration Date
19-09-2017
Judge
JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED) , MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
Coram
JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED) , MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
Bench Type
Double
Category
1.41 - LPA SERVICE HARYANA ( 346 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
LPA SECTION
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA
Respondent(s)
ISRAIL
Hearing History
Judge: JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED) , MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-01-2019 |
Orders
MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER,MR. JUSTICE LALIT BATRA
MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT,MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Summary of LPA/1803/2017 - State of Haryana v. Israil The High Court of Punjab & Haryana set aside the State's termination of Junior Engineer Israil, who was terminated during probation based solely on a bribery FIR without any disciplinary enquiry. Although the criminal court acquitted him, the court held that when termination involves stigmatic charges (misconduct allegations), a proper disciplinary enquiry is mandatory even for probationers. The court reinstated Israil and permitted the State to conduct a fresh disciplinary enquiry within six months to determine confirmation on independent merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of LPA/1803/2017 - State of Haryana v. Israil The High Court of Punjab & Haryana set aside the State's termination of Junior Engineer Israil, who was terminated during probation based solely on a bribery FIR without any disciplinary enquiry. Although the criminal court acquitted him, the court held that when termination involves stigmatic charges (misconduct allegations), a proper disciplinary enquiry is mandatory even for probationers. The court reinstated Israil and permitted the State to conduct a fresh disciplinary enquiry within six months to determine confirmation on independent merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts