STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA vs ISRAIL — LPA/1803/2017
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011345692017
Filing Number
LPA/1803/2017
Filing Date
16-Sep-2017
Registration No
LPA/1803/2017
Registration Date
19-Sep-2017
Judge
Justice (To Be Nominated) , Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor
Coram
Justice (To Be Nominated) , Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor
Bench Type
Double
Category
1.41 - LPA SERVICE HARYANA ( 346 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
LPA SECTION
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ISRAIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Justice (To Be Nominated),mr. Justice Rohit KapoorView PDF
Summary of LPA/1803/2017 - State of Haryana v. Israil The High Court of Punjab & Haryana set aside the State's termination of Junior Engineer Israil, who was terminated during probation based solely on a bribery FIR without any disciplinary enquiry. Although the criminal court acquitted him, the court held that when termination involves stigmatic charges (misconduct allegations), a proper disciplinary enquiry is mandatory even for probationers. The court reinstated Israil and permitted the State to conduct a fresh disciplinary enquiry within six months to determine confirmation on independent merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Jan-2019
—
Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh , Mr. Justice Hari Pal Verma
-
13-Dec-2018
Mr. Justice Mahesh Grover,mr. Justice Lalit Batra
-
09-Aug-2018
Mr. Justice Surya Kant,mr. Justice Sudip Ahluwalia
-
12-Feb-2018
Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal,mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal
-
16-Sep-2017
Case filed
Registration No. LPA/1803/2017
Summary of LPA/1803/2017 - State of Haryana v. Israil The High Court of Punjab & Haryana set aside the State's termination of Junior Engineer Israil, who was terminated during probation based solely on a bribery FIR without any disciplinary enquiry. Although the criminal court acquitted him, the court held that when termination involves stigmatic charges (misconduct allegations), a proper disciplinary enquiry is mandatory even for probationers. The court reinstated Israil and permitted the State to conduct a fresh disciplinary enquiry within six months to determine confirmation on independent merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts