VIRENDER SINGH vs JOGENDER SINGH — CRM-A/2337/2017

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Jan-2018

CNR: PHHC011343262017

Filing Number

CRM-A/2337/2017

Filing Date

27-Jul-2017

Registration No

CRM-A/2337/2017

Registration Date

25-Oct-2017

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

6.6 - SALES TAX APPEAL (INDIRECT) ( 399 )

Sub-Category

( 925 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIRENDER SINGH

    Adv. ABHISHEK YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOGENDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-A/2337/2017 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Virender Singh's leave to appeal against his acquittal in a Negotiable Instruments Act complaint case. Following recent Supreme Court precedent in M/s Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, the court held that a private complainant qualifies as a "victim" under Section 2(wa) of the Cr.P.C. and can appeal acquittals under Section 372 Cr.P.C. The court directed the Sessions Judge to treat the application as a formal appeal and decide it on merits expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jan-2019

    Mr. Justice Manoj Bajaj

  4. 17-Jan-2019

    —

    Mr. Justice B.S. Walia

  5. 15-Dec-2018

    Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta

  6. 08-May-2018

    Mr. Justice Surinder GuptaView PDF

  7. 08-May-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  8. 22-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Jul-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-A/2337/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-A/2337/2017 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Virender Singh's leave to appeal against his acquittal in a Negotiable Instruments Act complaint case. Following recent Supreme Court precedent in M/s Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, the court held that a private complainant qualifies as a "victim" under Section 2(wa) of the Cr.P.C. and can appeal acquittals under Section 372 Cr.P.C. The court directed the Sessions Judge to treat the application as a formal appeal and decide it on merits expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case