ARSHDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRM-M/46326/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011312672025

Filing Number

CRM-M/68834/2025

Filing Date

18-Aug-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/46326/2025

Registration Date

21-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARSHDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. Hitesh Verma

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.PARDEEP KUMAR PUNIA

  4. 4.PUNEET KUMAR @ PARVEEN KUMAR

  5. 5.TARJINDER SINGH @ TAJINDERPAL SINGH

  6. 6.HARJEET SINGH @ JEETI @ HARJIT SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.PARDEEP KUMAR PUNIA

  4. 4.PUNEET KUMAR @ PARVEEN KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed FIR No. 95 (dated 18.08.2023) registered under IPC Sections 341, 506, 427, 148, 149 and Arms Act Sections 25, 27 against petitioner Arshdeep Singh and others, based on a genuine Panchayati compromise dated 28.07.2025. The trial court confirmed the compromise was valid with no undue influence or coercion, making continued criminal proceedings a futile exercise and abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/46326/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed FIR No. 95 (dated 18.08.2023) registered under IPC Sections 341, 506, 427, 148, 149 and Arms Act Sections 25, 27 against petitioner Arshdeep Singh and others, based on a genuine Panchayati compromise dated 28.07.2025. The trial court confirmed the compromise was valid with no undue influence or coercion, making continued criminal proceedings a futile exercise and abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case