NARESH KUMAR AND OTHERS vs ANURAG RASTOGI AND OTHERS — COCP/4237/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Aug-2025

CNR: PHHC011303832025

Filing Number

COCP/50879/2025

Filing Date

18-Aug-2025

Registration No

COCP/4237/2025

Registration Date

20-Aug-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. MUKESH YADAV

  2. 2.ANURAG RASTOGI CHIEF SECRETARY

  3. 3.VIRENDER SINGH

  4. 4.SHARDA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANURAG RASTOGI AND OTHERS

  2. 2.ANURAG RASTOGI CHIEF SECRETARY

  3. 3.VIRENDER SINGH

  4. 4.SHARDA KUMARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: COCP-4237-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the contempt petition filed by Naresh Kumar and others, finding that the respondents had fully complied with the earlier Writ Court order by disbursing pension arrears to all three petitioners as required. Since the alleged violation had been remedied and nothing survived in the petition, the court discharged the rule and disposed of the case, with no further orders necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/4237/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COCP-4237-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the contempt petition filed by Naresh Kumar and others, finding that the respondents had fully complied with the earlier Writ Court order by disbursing pension arrears to all three petitioners as required. Since the alleged violation had been remedied and nothing survived in the petition, the court discharged the rule and disposed of the case, with no further orders necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case