KARAMBIR SINGH vs PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER — CWP/33818/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Nov-2019

CNR: PHHC011300552019

Filing Number

CWP/69118/2019

Filing Date

22-Oct-2019

Registration No

CWP/33818/2019

Registration Date

19-Nov-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Bench Type

Single

Category

18.5 - LABOUR ( 452 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARAMBIR SINGH

    Adv. RAKESH DHIMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SALWAN PUBLIC SCHOOL, GURUGRAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/33818/2019 - Karambir Singh v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the Industrial Tribunal's order rejecting the workmen's industrial dispute references as non-maintainable. The court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication on merits, holding that remedies under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 cannot be overridden by alternative remedies under special laws. Key Reasoning: Following established Supreme Court precedent and its own Division Bench decisions, the court held that workmen retain the right to pursue industrial disputes regardless of availability of alternative remedies (such as educational tribunals). The Tribunal must adjudicate alleged violations of Sections 25F, 25G, and 25H of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Nov-2019

    Other

  4. 22-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/33818/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/33818/2019 - Karambir Singh v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the Industrial Tribunal's order rejecting the workmen's industrial dispute references as non-maintainable. The court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication on merits, holding that remedies under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 cannot be overridden by alternative remedies under special laws. Key Reasoning: Following established Supreme Court precedent and its own Division Bench decisions, the court held that workmen retain the right to pursue industrial disputes regardless of availability of alternative remedies (such as educational tribunals). The Tribunal must adjudicate alleged violations of Sections 25F, 25G, and 25H of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case