M/S T. STANES AND COMPANY LIMITED vs THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMER WELFARE DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — LPA/1747/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Nov-2023

CNR: PHHC011295782023

Filing Number

LPA/52188/2023

Filing Date

04-Oct-2023

Registration No

LPA/1747/2023

Registration Date

15-Nov-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Category

1.15 - LPA GENERAL MISC. ( 339 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

LPA SECTION

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S T. STANES AND COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. R K GIRDHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMER WELFARE DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.THE JOINT DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE CUM LICENSING AUTHORITY, PUNJAB

  3. 3.THE INSECTICIDE INSPECTOR, BATHINDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of T. Stanes and Company Limited's appeal (LPA-1747-2023) on March 24, 2026, after the appellant's counsel submitted that the company intended to approach the Government for a lenient view under the Rules and requested the appeal be withdrawn without further pressing. The court granted the withdrawal with liberty to approach the Government as sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Nov-2023

    Other

  4. 04-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPA/1747/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of T. Stanes and Company Limited's appeal (LPA-1747-2023) on March 24, 2026, after the appellant's counsel submitted that the company intended to approach the Government for a lenient view under the Rules and requested the appeal be withdrawn without further pressing. The court granted the withdrawal with liberty to approach the Government as sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case