HARI MOHAN PARSAD vs PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER — LPA/2940/2025

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011284652025

Filing Number

LPA/50170/2025

Filing Date

12-Aug-2025

Registration No

LPA/2940/2025

Registration Date

30-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri , Mrs. Justice Amarjot Bhatti

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri , Mrs. Justice Amarjot Bhatti

Category

1.16 - LPA LABOUR / INDUSTRIAL ( 340 )

Judicial Branch

LPA SECTION

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI MOHAN PARSAD

    Adv. ALISHA SONI

  2. 2.HARI MOHAN PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.HARI MOHAN PRASAD

  3. 3.M/S EICHER TRACTORS LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri,mrs. Justice Amarjot BhattiView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellant Hari Mohan Prasad's application seeking condonation of a 317-day delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court found that the appellant's sole reason—lack of funds—was insufficient to constitute "sufficient cause" for the delay and rejected the claim that the delay was unintentional. Consequently, both the condonation application and the main appeal (LPA-2940-2025) were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPA/2940/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellant Hari Mohan Prasad's application seeking condonation of a 317-day delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court found that the appellant's sole reason—lack of funds—was insufficient to constitute "sufficient cause" for the delay and rejected the claim that the delay was unintentional. Consequently, both the condonation application and the main appeal (LPA-2940-2025) were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case