SAHIL CHHABRA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/44532/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011282752025

Filing Number

CRM-M/67185/2025

Filing Date

12-Aug-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/44532/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHIL CHHABRA

    Adv. SATWANT SINGH RANGI

  2. 2.SAHIL CHHABRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SAHIL CHHABRA

  3. 3.SUMEET SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-44532/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed anticipatory bail petitions filed by Sahil Chhabra, Jatinder Kumar Chawla, and Baldev Raj Chhabra in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, and 120-B (criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy). The court accepted the petitioners' contention that the FIR arose from a financial dispute allegedly converted into a criminal offense, with the complainant failing to pursue civil remedies before lodging the complaint. The court made interim bail orders absolute, requiring petitioners to continue joining investigations and comply with bail conditions, including passport submission within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/44532/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-44532/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed anticipatory bail petitions filed by Sahil Chhabra, Jatinder Kumar Chawla, and Baldev Raj Chhabra in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, and 120-B (criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy). The court accepted the petitioners' contention that the FIR arose from a financial dispute allegedly converted into a criminal offense, with the complainant failing to pursue civil remedies before lodging the complaint. The court made interim bail orders absolute, requiring petitioners to continue joining investigations and comply with bail conditions, including passport submission within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case