MAHENDER SINGH THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS & OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CR/5444/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011271022025

Filing Number

CR/49646/2025

Filing Date

08-Aug-2025

Registration No

CR/5444/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.15 - LAND ACQUISITION ACT ( 509 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDER SINGH THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS & OTHERS

    Adv. GOVIND RANA

  2. 2.MEHENDER SINGH

  3. 3.DEPENDER SINGH

  4. 4.LAC

  5. 5.SATYAWAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.MEHENDER SINGH

  3. 3.DEPENDER SINGH

  4. 4.LAC

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/5444/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petitioners' revision petition against the dismissal of their execution petition for land acquisition compensation. The lower court had rejected their claim solely because they failed to file objections under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, despite being co-sharers with those who did. Justice Harkesh Manuja set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, holding that co-sharers are entitled to equal compensation as their co-owners, with interest at 5 years and 9% penalty interest if payment deadlines are missed, in accordance with the Supreme Court's recent decision in *Ramphal & Ors v. HSIDC Ltd*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/5444/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/5444/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petitioners' revision petition against the dismissal of their execution petition for land acquisition compensation. The lower court had rejected their claim solely because they failed to file objections under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, despite being co-sharers with those who did. Justice Harkesh Manuja set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, holding that co-sharers are entitled to equal compensation as their co-owners, with interest at 5 years and 9% penalty interest if payment deadlines are missed, in accordance with the Supreme Court's recent decision in *Ramphal & Ors v. HSIDC Ltd*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case