M/S PAHWA IMPEX PVT LTD vs M/S KANUJ HOME TEXTILES EXIM — CR/5403/2025
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011270852025
Filing Number
CR/49633/2025
Filing Date
08-Aug-2025
Registration No
CR/5403/2025
Registration Date
11-Aug-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri
Coram
Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri
Bench Type
Single
Category
30.13 - ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT ( 507 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S PAHWA IMPEX PVT LTD
Adv. SHASHANK SHEKHAR SHARMA
-
2.MS PHAWA IMPEX PVT LTD
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S KANUJ HOME TEXTILES EXIM
-
2.MS PHAWA IMPEX PVT LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh PuriView PDF
Case Summary: CR/5403/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the civil revision petition filed by M/S Pahwa Impex Pvt Ltd, holding the petition not entertainable. The court found that the petitioner, having withdrawn objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act 1996 and then challenged the same award through an Article 227 revision petition, was barred from re-agitating identical grounds and attempting to circumvent the statutory remedy it had abandoned. Key Reasoning: The court reasoned that Article 227's supervisory jurisdiction cannot substitute for specific statutory remedies. Having fully participated in arbitration proceedings and explicitly withdrawn Section 34 objections, the petitioner was estopped from seeking relief on the same grounds through revision petition. The court also noted the petitioner failed to deposit 75% of the awarded amount as mandated under Section 19 of the MSMED Act 2006, further weakening its position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CR/5403/2025
Case Summary: CR/5403/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the civil revision petition filed by M/S Pahwa Impex Pvt Ltd, holding the petition not entertainable. The court found that the petitioner, having withdrawn objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act 1996 and then challenged the same award through an Article 227 revision petition, was barred from re-agitating identical grounds and attempting to circumvent the statutory remedy it had abandoned. Key Reasoning: The court reasoned that Article 227's supervisory jurisdiction cannot substitute for specific statutory remedies. Having fully participated in arbitration proceedings and explicitly withdrawn Section 34 objections, the petitioner was estopped from seeking relief on the same grounds through revision petition. The court also noted the petitioner failed to deposit 75% of the awarded amount as mandated under Section 19 of the MSMED Act 2006, further weakening its position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts