SURESH KUMAR vs DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL CENTRE MALWAL ROAD AND ANOTHER — RSA/2413/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011254002022

Filing Number

RSA/50291/2022

Filing Date

02-Nov-2022

Registration No

RSA/2413/2023

Registration Date

24-Jul-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH KUMAR

    Adv. KAMAL NARULA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL CENTRE MALWAL ROAD AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL COUNCIL FEROZEPUR CITY.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikram AggarwalView PDF

    Summary of RSA/2413/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Suresh Kumar's appeal seeking a permanent injunction to prevent the District Industrial Centre from removing his iron kiosk installed at Malwal Road, Ferozepur City. The court upheld concurrent findings by lower courts that Kumar's possession was merely permissive under the Punjab Municipal Act and could be revoked at any time, noting that an earlier similar suit filed by Kumar had already been dismissed with finality. The court held that Kumar, as an illegal occupant without written permission, had no legal right to claim injunctive protection and that the removal process was lawful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/2413/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of RSA/2413/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Suresh Kumar's appeal seeking a permanent injunction to prevent the District Industrial Centre from removing his iron kiosk installed at Malwal Road, Ferozepur City. The court upheld concurrent findings by lower courts that Kumar's possession was merely permissive under the Punjab Municipal Act and could be revoked at any time, noting that an earlier similar suit filed by Kumar had already been dismissed with finality. The court held that Kumar, as an illegal occupant without written permission, had no legal right to claim injunctive protection and that the removal process was lawful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case