PARAMJIT SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/44003/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011252272025

Filing Number

CRM-M/65581/2025

Filing Date

06-Aug-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/44003/2025

Registration Date

11-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAMJIT SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. RAJEEV K. KAPILA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.NEELAM KUMARI

  4. 4.RAJVEE SINGH

  5. 5.GURPREET SINGH

  6. 6.SURINDER SINGH

  7. 7.SUBINDER SINGH

  8. 8.RAJWINDER KUMAR

  9. 9.BEANT KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.NEELAM KUMARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 0071 (dated 26.07.2019) registered against Paramjit Singh and others at Police Station Chabbewal, Hoshiarpur, involving charges under IPC Sections 307, 336, 506 and Arms Act Sections 25, 27, 30. The court found that parties had effected a genuine compromise without coercion, with both parties' statements recorded before the Judicial Magistrate confirming the settlement, and exercised Section 482 Cr.PC powers to quash proceedings given remote chances of conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/44003/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 0071 (dated 26.07.2019) registered against Paramjit Singh and others at Police Station Chabbewal, Hoshiarpur, involving charges under IPC Sections 307, 336, 506 and Arms Act Sections 25, 27, 30. The court found that parties had effected a genuine compromise without coercion, with both parties' statements recorded before the Judicial Magistrate confirming the settlement, and exercised Section 482 Cr.PC powers to quash proceedings given remote chances of conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case