SANJEEV KUMAR vs STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS Advocate - Gaurav Goel — CWP/24906/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Oct-2022

CNR: PHHC011232912022

Filing Number

CWP/49487/2022

Filing Date

28-Oct-2022

Registration No

CWP/24906/2022

Registration Date

28-Oct-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV KUMAR

    Adv. AALOK JAGGA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS Advocate - Gaurav Goel

  2. 2.TEHSILDAR CUM EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, SOUTH

  3. 3.AMAN BHATIA

  4. 4.M/S G.K. CREATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of Sanjeev Kumar's writ petition challenging SBI's demand for ₹4,83,65,924 under the SARFAESI Act, after SBI fairly conceded that Kumar's guarantee liability is capped at ₹1 crore plus interest and ancillary charges as per the guarantee deed dated 02.04.2014, and cannot exceed that amount. The court granted Kumar liberty to pursue all pleas before the pending DRT proceedings and challenge any further SARFAESI action by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Oct-2022

    Other

  4. 28-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/24906/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of Sanjeev Kumar's writ petition challenging SBI's demand for ₹4,83,65,924 under the SARFAESI Act, after SBI fairly conceded that Kumar's guarantee liability is capped at ₹1 crore plus interest and ancillary charges as per the guarantee deed dated 02.04.2014, and cannot exceed that amount. The court granted Kumar liberty to pursue all pleas before the pending DRT proceedings and challenge any further SARFAESI action by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case