DARSHAN SINGH ALIAS GURDARSHAN SINGH vs GURJIT SINGH AND OTHERS — RSA/2263/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011228392022

Filing Number

RSA/49304/2022

Filing Date

27-Oct-2022

Registration No

RSA/2263/2022

Registration Date

28-Oct-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu

Coram

Mr. Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DARSHAN SINGH ALIAS GURDARSHAN SINGH

    Adv. RAJINDER SINGH RANGPURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURJIT SINGH AND OTHERS

  2. 2.KAMALDEEP SINGH

  3. 3.RAJINDER SINGH

  4. 4.JAGDEV SINGH

  5. 5.BABA DALBIR SINGH

  6. 6.MALKIT SINGH

  7. 7.BALDEV SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Mahabir Singh SindhuView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the impleading of legal representatives of the deceased appellant Darshan Singh to continue the appeal. Subsequently, the Court allowed the appellant's withdrawal of the Regular Second Appeal challenging the dismissal of his permanent injunction suit, as the appellant had already availed alternate remedy before the civil court. The appellant retains the right to seek revival of the appeal later if circumstances warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/2263/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the impleading of legal representatives of the deceased appellant Darshan Singh to continue the appeal. Subsequently, the Court allowed the appellant's withdrawal of the Regular Second Appeal challenging the dismissal of his permanent injunction suit, as the appellant had already availed alternate remedy before the civil court. The appellant retains the right to seek revival of the appeal later if circumstances warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case