ABHI GILL vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/42172/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011216742025

Filing Number

CRM-M/63670/2025

Filing Date

01-Aug-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/42172/2025

Registration Date

02-Aug-2025

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHI GILL

    Adv. HITESH CHOPRA

  2. 2.ABHI GILL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.ABHI GILL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-42172-2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Abhi Gill in an NDPS Act case (FIR No. 105, Section 21) where he was accused of supplying heroin based on a co-accused's disclosure statement. Justice Manisha Batra found that while disclosure statements under Section 67 NDPS require independent corroboration, no contraband was recovered from the petitioner himself, and there was insufficient evidence on record to connect him to the crime at the bail stage. With investigation concluded and trial prospects bleak, the court deemed continued custody purposeless and released him on bail with personal and surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/42172/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-42172-2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Abhi Gill in an NDPS Act case (FIR No. 105, Section 21) where he was accused of supplying heroin based on a co-accused's disclosure statement. Justice Manisha Batra found that while disclosure statements under Section 67 NDPS require independent corroboration, no contraband was recovered from the petitioner himself, and there was insufficient evidence on record to connect him to the crime at the bail stage. With investigation concluded and trial prospects bleak, the court deemed continued custody purposeless and released him on bail with personal and surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case