SATPAL ABHISHEK VIG, NAVEEN GUPTA vs DILBAGH AND ORS — RSA/3952/2016

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Aug-2016

CNR: PHHC011215752016

Filing Number

RSA/3952/2016

Filing Date

05-Aug-2016

Registration No

RSA/3952/2016

Registration Date

05-Aug-2016

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

77.5 - EXECUTION PETITION (COMMERCIAL) ( 253 )

Sub-Category

( 921 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATPAL ABHISHEK VIG, NAVEEN GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILBAGH AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court allowed the appellant's Second Appeal, setting aside concurrent judgments dismissing his declaratory suit. The Court held that in a related case (RSA-261-1999), it had already established that appellant Satpal was the owner in settled possession of the suit land, and therefore declared the revenue entries in favor of respondents 1-3 as illegal and void, restraining them from interfering with the plaintiff's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Aug-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan

  4. 06-Mar-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan

  5. 04-Aug-2017

    Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik

  6. 04-Aug-2017

    —

    Mr. Justice T.H.B. Chalapathi

  7. 09-Feb-2017

    Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik

  8. 09-Feb-2017

    —

    Mr. Justice T.H.B. Chalapathi

  9. 09-Nov-2016

    Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh

  10. 09-Nov-2016

    —

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal

  11. 26-Oct-2016

    Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh

  12. 26-Oct-2016

    —

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal

  13. 05-Sep-2016

    Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh

  14. 05-Sep-2016

    —

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal

  15. 08-Aug-2016

    Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh

  16. 08-Aug-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 05-Aug-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/3952/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court allowed the appellant's Second Appeal, setting aside concurrent judgments dismissing his declaratory suit. The Court held that in a related case (RSA-261-1999), it had already established that appellant Satpal was the owner in settled possession of the suit land, and therefore declared the revenue entries in favor of respondents 1-3 as illegal and void, restraining them from interfering with the plaintiff's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case