SARAL MOBILE PROJECT SERVICES PVT LTD vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/22231/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Aug-2025

CNR: PHHC011210992025

e-Filing Number

30-07-2025

Filing Number

CWP/47326/2025

Filing Date

31-Jul-2025

Registration No

CWP/22231/2025

Registration Date

01-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.13 - MISC. HARYANA ( 739 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARAL MOBILE PROJECT SERVICES PVT LTD

    Adv. SUMEET JAIN

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Deputy Commissioner

  4. 4.Chief Administrator

  5. 5.Estate Officer

  6. 6.Chairman cum Managing Director

  7. 7.Sub Divisional Officer

  8. 8.Residents Welfare Association

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/22231/2025 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition and set aside the Deputy Commissioner's cancellation order dated 02.07.2025, reinstating the mobile tower installation permission granted on 07.01.2025. Key Reasoning: Justice Jagmohan Bansal found that the Deputy Commissioner lacked authority to cancel an already-granted permission based on resident objections citing health concerns. The court held that Section 16 of the Telecommunications Act, 2023 (which permits relocation/alteration of installed networks) was inapplicable since the tower had not yet been installed. The court found the "public interest" justification manifestly baseless, noting mobile towers operate similarly across the state without differentiated health treatment by locality. The proper procedure would require the property owner to request relocation through District Magistrate channels, not unilateral cancellation by the Deputy Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/22231/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/22231/2025 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition and set aside the Deputy Commissioner's cancellation order dated 02.07.2025, reinstating the mobile tower installation permission granted on 07.01.2025. Key Reasoning: Justice Jagmohan Bansal found that the Deputy Commissioner lacked authority to cancel an already-granted permission based on resident objections citing health concerns. The court held that Section 16 of the Telecommunications Act, 2023 (which permits relocation/alteration of installed networks) was inapplicable since the tower had not yet been installed. The court found the "public interest" justification manifestly baseless, noting mobile towers operate similarly across the state without differentiated health treatment by locality. The proper procedure would require the property owner to request relocation through District Magistrate channels, not unilateral cancellation by the Deputy Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case