M/S AHUJA KASHYAP PVT LTD vs M/S MANDAP INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD — CR/3526/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011210352021

Filing Number

CR/72904/2021

Filing Date

20-Dec-2021

Registration No

CR/3526/2021

Registration Date

23-Dec-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

30.58 - ASSESSMENT RENT/FAIR RENT & MESNE PROFIT HRY. ( 535 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S AHUJA KASHYAP PVT LTD

    Adv. ABHINAV BAJAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S MANDAP INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikram AggarwalView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/3526/2021 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the landlord's revision petition, upholding the lower courts' decision to fix fair rent at Rs. 1,03,680/- per month under Section 4 of the Haryana Urban Rent Control Act, 1973. Key Reasoning: The court held that since the tenant continued in possession after the 2003 lease expired, a monthly tenancy was created at the last agreed rent of Rs. 72,000/-. Following Supreme Court precedent, where rent was being paid and accepted (Rs. 1,03,680/-), this constituted the fair rent under Section 4(2)(b). The landlord cannot demand market-rate rent when an agreed rent subsists; only after fair rent is fixed can re-fixation be sought under statutory limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/3526/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/3526/2021 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the landlord's revision petition, upholding the lower courts' decision to fix fair rent at Rs. 1,03,680/- per month under Section 4 of the Haryana Urban Rent Control Act, 1973. Key Reasoning: The court held that since the tenant continued in possession after the 2003 lease expired, a monthly tenancy was created at the last agreed rent of Rs. 72,000/-. Following Supreme Court precedent, where rent was being paid and accepted (Rs. 1,03,680/-), this constituted the fair rent under Section 4(2)(b). The landlord cannot demand market-rate rent when an agreed rent subsists; only after fair rent is fixed can re-fixation be sought under statutory limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case