GURJIT SINGH ALIAS JEETA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/42898/2025
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC011205592025
Filing Number
CRM-M/63132/2025
Filing Date
30-Jul-2025
Registration No
CRM-M/42898/2025
Registration Date
05-Aug-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi
Coram
Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GURJIT SINGH ALIAS JEETA
Adv. KULBHUSHAN RAHEJA
-
2.GURJIT SINGH @ JEETA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
-
2.GURJIT SINGH @ JEETA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gurjit Singh @ Jeeta in a murder case (FIR No.48/2021), finding that he was neither named in the FIR nor visible in CCTV footage, with material witnesses failing to support the prosecution case. The court noted the petitioner had been in custody since July 2022 while only 3 of 33 prosecution witnesses were examined, making trial conclusion unlikely, and the main co-accused had already been granted bail. Bail was granted with conditions including monthly police station appearances, deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 FDR, and prohibition on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/42898/2025
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gurjit Singh @ Jeeta in a murder case (FIR No.48/2021), finding that he was neither named in the FIR nor visible in CCTV footage, with material witnesses failing to support the prosecution case. The court noted the petitioner had been in custody since July 2022 while only 3 of 33 prosecution witnesses were examined, making trial conclusion unlikely, and the main co-accused had already been granted bail. Bail was granted with conditions including monthly police station appearances, deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 FDR, and prohibition on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts