GANGADHAR SHARMA vs PSEB NOW PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY CORP. LTD. AND ORS. — RSA/2919/2013
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011179322013
Filing Number
RSA/2919/2013
Filing Date
11-Jun-2013
Registration No
RSA/2919/2013
Registration Date
27-Jul-2013
Judge
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Coram
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Category
26.1 - RSA SERVICE ( 497 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GANGADHAR SHARMA
Adv. SHYAM KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PSEB NOW PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY CORP. LTD. AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: RSA 2919/2013 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Gangadhar Sharma's appeal against PSEB, holding that his work-charged service from April 1955 to May 1991 must be counted toward qualifying service for pension benefits. The Court found the lower courts erred in ignoring established precedent (Kesar Chand case) and incorrectly applying limitation periods, noting pension claims constitute a continuous cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Sep-2017
Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari
-
30-Nov-2016
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
05-Jul-2016
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
11-Apr-2016
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
19-Nov-2015
Mr. Justice Arun Palli
-
17-Jul-2015
Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
-
17-Jul-2015
Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
-
30-Apr-2015
Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
-
13-Nov-2014
Mr Justice Jaswant Singh
-
19-Mar-2014
Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik
-
23-Sep-2013
Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg
-
11-Jun-2013
Case filed
Registration No. RSA/2919/2013
Case Summary: RSA 2919/2013 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Gangadhar Sharma's appeal against PSEB, holding that his work-charged service from April 1955 to May 1991 must be counted toward qualifying service for pension benefits. The Court found the lower courts erred in ignoring established precedent (Kesar Chand case) and incorrectly applying limitation periods, noting pension claims constitute a continuous cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts