JAI PARKASH vs DISTRICT CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ROHTAK AND ANR — RSA/2706/2013
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011177012013
Filing Number
RSA/2706/2013
Filing Date
09-May-2013
Registration No
RSA/2706/2013
Registration Date
09-Jul-2013
Judge
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Coram
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Category
26.1 - RSA SERVICE ( 497 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAI PARKASH
Adv. RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.DISTRICT CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ROHTAK AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF
-
07-Dec-2017
Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari
-
02-Nov-2017
Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari
-
26-Sep-2017
Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari
-
18-Apr-2017
Mr. Justice Rajiv Narain Raina
-
17-Dec-2016
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
28-Nov-2016
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
28-Sep-2016
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
08-Sep-2016
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
18-Sep-2015
Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh
-
29-Jul-2015
Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
-
13-Jul-2015
Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
-
13-Nov-2014
Mr Justice Jaswant Singh
-
18-Mar-2014
Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik
-
02-Sep-2013
Mr Justice Jaswant Singh
-
09-May-2013
Case filed
Registration No. RSA/2706/2013
-
13-May-2012
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Jai Parkash's appeal (RSA 2706/2013) for want of prosecution on 13.05.2026. The notice to the appellant could not be served due to incomplete address, and his counsel had been elevated to the Bench, leaving the court with no option but to dismiss. The court reserved liberty for the appellant to revive the appeal if any cause of action survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Jai Parkash's appeal (RSA 2706/2013) for want of prosecution on 13.05.2026. The notice to the appellant could not be served due to incomplete address, and his counsel had been elevated to the Bench, leaving the court with no option but to dismiss. The court reserved liberty for the appellant to revive the appeal if any cause of action survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts