JAGMENDER vs DIST REVENUE OFFICER & ORS — RFA/502/2014

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2014

CNR: PHHC011173572014

Filing Number

RFA/502/2014

Filing Date

21-Jan-2014

Registration No

RFA/502/2014

Registration Date

21-Jan-2014

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

25.4 - RFA (LAND ACQUISITION) HARYANA ( 494 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL-I(RFA) BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGMENDER

    Adv. DEEPAK BALYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIST REVENUE OFFICER & ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the Reference Court's determination of fair market value at ₹16,00,000 per acre for land acquired in villages Mehlana and Barwasni under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court dismissed all eleven appeals—both landowners' appeals seeking further enhancement and the State's appeals for reduction—finding that the Reference Court's reliance on a comparable prior award from 2008 for the same area and public purpose was legally sound, while rejecting unsupported sale instances from both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2014

    Mr. Justice Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon

  4. 07-Apr-2014

    —

    Mr. Justice J.C. Verma

  5. 21-Jan-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/502/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the Reference Court's determination of fair market value at ₹16,00,000 per acre for land acquired in villages Mehlana and Barwasni under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court dismissed all eleven appeals—both landowners' appeals seeking further enhancement and the State's appeals for reduction—finding that the Reference Court's reliance on a comparable prior award from 2008 for the same area and public purpose was legally sound, while rejecting unsupported sale instances from both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case