SANDEEP KUMAR AND ORS. vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. — CRM-M/40286/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011170802025

Filing Number

CRM-M/61341/2025

Filing Date

25-Jul-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/40286/2025

Registration Date

25-Jul-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP KUMAR AND ORS.

    Adv. DEEPANSHU MATYA

  2. 2.SANDEEP KUMAR

  3. 3.LOKESH SIINGH

  4. 4.YOGESH KUAMR

  5. 5.SAHAB SINGH @ SABU

  6. 6.GOLI @ HARDEV

  7. 7.SAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

  2. 2.SANDEEP KUMAR

  3. 3.LOKESH SIINGH

  4. 4.YOGESH KUAMR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 20 (dated 28.01.2025) registered against Sandeep Kumar and others under various BNS sections at Police Station Gadpuri, District Palwal, on the basis of a genuine compromise between parties. The court, after directing the trial magistrate to verify the voluntariness of the settlement, found the compromise was effected without coercion or undue influence, and neither the State nor other respondents disputed it, making further proceedings unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/40286/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 20 (dated 28.01.2025) registered against Sandeep Kumar and others under various BNS sections at Police Station Gadpuri, District Palwal, on the basis of a genuine compromise between parties. The court, after directing the trial magistrate to verify the voluntariness of the settlement, found the compromise was effected without coercion or undue influence, and neither the State nor other respondents disputed it, making further proceedings unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case