SANTOSH KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/41333/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011167632025

Filing Number

CRM-M/61141/2025

Filing Date

25-Jul-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/41333/2025

Registration Date

30-Jul-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH KUMAR

    Adv. ASHUTOSH PANDEY

  2. 2.SANTOSH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.SANTOSH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-41333/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Santosh Kumar, accused of knife attack causing grievous injury (IPC Sections 307, 323, 324, 341, 506). The court noted that while the petitioner had previously misused bail by remaining absent during trial, he had since surrendered and suffered over one year of incarceration, no prosecution witnesses had been examined out of nine, and he maintained a clean criminal record. The court deemed bail appropriate given the trial's expected duration and lack of trial progress. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/41333/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-41333/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Santosh Kumar, accused of knife attack causing grievous injury (IPC Sections 307, 323, 324, 341, 506). The court noted that while the petitioner had previously misused bail by remaining absent during trial, he had since surrendered and suffered over one year of incarceration, no prosecution witnesses had been examined out of nine, and he maintained a clean criminal record. The court deemed bail appropriate given the trial's expected duration and lack of trial progress. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case