UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD vs SANGITA DEVI & OTHERS — FAO/7779/2017
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011157652017
Filing Number
FAO/7779/2017
Filing Date
30-Nov-2017
Registration No
FAO/7779/2017
Registration Date
30-Nov-2017
Judge
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Coram
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Category
500.3 - UNITED INDIA INSURANCE ( 895 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD
Adv. ASHWANI TALWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANGITA DEVI & OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: FAO/7779/2017 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the insurance company's appeal challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's compensation award of Rs.20,69,000. However, the court enhanced the total compensation to Rs.25,69,200 after recalculating based on settled legal principles, finding the tribunal had erred in applying 50% future prospects instead of the correct 40%, underestimated the deceased's income, and failed to award adequate loss of estate and consortium amounts. The court awarded 9% interest per annum from the petition filing date until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Sep-2018
—
Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan
-
01-Jun-2018
—
Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan
-
27-Mar-2018
—
Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan
-
01-Dec-2017
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal
-
01-Dec-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Nov-2017
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/7779/2017
Case Summary: FAO/7779/2017 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the insurance company's appeal challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's compensation award of Rs.20,69,000. However, the court enhanced the total compensation to Rs.25,69,200 after recalculating based on settled legal principles, finding the tribunal had erred in applying 50% future prospects instead of the correct 40%, underestimated the deceased's income, and failed to award adequate loss of estate and consortium amounts. The court awarded 9% interest per annum from the petition filing date until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts