RAJEEV ARORA ALIAS RAJEEV PUNANI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/39749/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011157342025

Filing Number

CRM-M/60631/2025

Filing Date

23-Jul-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/39749/2025

Registration Date

24-Jul-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJEEV ARORA ALIAS RAJEEV PUNANI

    Adv. Naresh Kumar

  2. 2.RAJEEV ARORA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.RAJEEV ARORA

  3. 3.SOMWATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M-39749/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 361 (dated 23.10.2023) against petitioner Rajeev Arora under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, and 471, based on a genuine compromise dated 04.07.2025 between the petitioner and the complainant. The trial court verified the compromise was voluntary and without coercion, with the complainant consenting to quashing. The court applied established precedent permitting FIR quashing in cases of legitimate compromise between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/39749/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M-39749/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 361 (dated 23.10.2023) against petitioner Rajeev Arora under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, and 471, based on a genuine compromise dated 04.07.2025 between the petitioner and the complainant. The trial court verified the compromise was voluntary and without coercion, with the complainant consenting to quashing. The court applied established precedent permitting FIR quashing in cases of legitimate compromise between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case