SATBIR AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — RFA/2921/2015
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011144042015
Filing Number
RFA/2921/2015
Filing Date
22-Apr-2015
Registration No
RFA/2921/2015
Registration Date
19-May-2015
Judge
Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja
Coram
Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
25.4 - RFA (LAND ACQUISITION) HARYANA ( 494 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL-I(RFA) BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATBIR AND ORS
Adv. VIMAL KUMAR GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partly allowed the appeal by landowners Satbir and others regarding land acquisition in Village Sanghan, Kaithal for the Shergarh Guhna Link Channel project. The court enhanced the compensation from Rs.18,00,000/- per acre (awarded by the Reference Court) to Rs.27,87,840/- per acre, applying the same valuation rate established in the adjacent Village Mal Kheri case, as both villages were acquired under identical notifications for the same public purpose and possessed homogeneous characteristics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Sep-2016
Mr. Justice Arun Palli
-
14-Sep-2016
Mr. Justice Arun Palli
-
20-Jul-2016
Mr. Justice Arun Palli
-
28-Apr-2016
Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik
-
14-Jan-2016
Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik
-
06-Aug-2015
Mrs Justice Sabina
-
22-Apr-2015
Case filed
Registration No. RFA/2921/2015
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partly allowed the appeal by landowners Satbir and others regarding land acquisition in Village Sanghan, Kaithal for the Shergarh Guhna Link Channel project. The court enhanced the compensation from Rs.18,00,000/- per acre (awarded by the Reference Court) to Rs.27,87,840/- per acre, applying the same valuation rate established in the adjacent Village Mal Kheri case, as both villages were acquired under identical notifications for the same public purpose and possessed homogeneous characteristics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts