JASWINDER KUMAR vs PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR — FAO/3401/2018
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011138192018
Filing Number
FAO/3401/2018
Filing Date
22-03-2018
Registration No
FAO/3401/2018
Registration Date
07-06-2018
Judge
MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Coram
MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Category
23.9 - FAO AGST INDIAN LUNANCY ACT M-1) ( 489 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JASWINDER KUMAR
Adv. ARUN JINDAL
Respondent(s)
PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR
Orders
Summary of FAO/3401/2018 - Jaswinder Kumar v. PEPSU Road Transport Corporation The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Jaswinder Kumar's appeal and substantially enhanced motor accident compensation from Rs. 18,38,113 to Rs. 85,38,113 (net enhancement of Rs. 67 lakhs), citing the claimant's 100% permanent disability, grossly underestimated income assessment by the tribunal, and inadequate awards for pain/suffering and attendant charges under Motor Vehicles Act principles. The court awarded 9% interest from petition filing date, excluding the 2208-day delay period, directing deposit within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of FAO/3401/2018 - Jaswinder Kumar v. PEPSU Road Transport Corporation The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Jaswinder Kumar's appeal and substantially enhanced motor accident compensation from Rs. 18,38,113 to Rs. 85,38,113 (net enhancement of Rs. 67 lakhs), citing the claimant's 100% permanent disability, grossly underestimated income assessment by the tribunal, and inadequate awards for pain/suffering and attendant charges under Motor Vehicles Act principles. The court awarded 9% interest from petition filing date, excluding the 2208-day delay period, directing deposit within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts