JASWINDER KUMAR vs PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR — FAO/3401/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC011138192018

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

FAO/3401/2018

Filing Date

22-03-2018

Registration No

FAO/3401/2018

Registration Date

07-06-2018

Judge

MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Coram

MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Category

23.9 - FAO AGST INDIAN LUNANCY ACT M-1) ( 489 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

JASWINDER KUMAR

Adv. ARUN JINDAL

Respondent(s)

PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR

Orders

14-05-2026
MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Summary of FAO/3401/2018 - Jaswinder Kumar v. PEPSU Road Transport Corporation The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Jaswinder Kumar's appeal and substantially enhanced motor accident compensation from Rs. 18,38,113 to Rs. 85,38,113 (net enhancement of Rs. 67 lakhs), citing the claimant's 100% permanent disability, grossly underestimated income assessment by the tribunal, and inadequate awards for pain/suffering and attendant charges under Motor Vehicles Act principles. The court awarded 9% interest from petition filing date, excluding the 2208-day delay period, directing deposit within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of FAO/3401/2018 - Jaswinder Kumar v. PEPSU Road Transport Corporation The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Jaswinder Kumar's appeal and substantially enhanced motor accident compensation from Rs. 18,38,113 to Rs. 85,38,113 (net enhancement of Rs. 67 lakhs), citing the claimant's 100% permanent disability, grossly underestimated income assessment by the tribunal, and inadequate awards for pain/suffering and attendant charges under Motor Vehicles Act principles. The court awarded 9% interest from petition filing date, excluding the 2208-day delay period, directing deposit within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case