BALA AND ORS. vs SAJJAD AHMAD GANAI AND ORS. — FAO/299/2018
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011133632018
Filing Number
FAO/299/2018
Filing Date
16-Jan-2018
Registration No
FAO/299/2018
Registration Date
16-Jan-2018
Judge
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Coram
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Category
500.27 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 892 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALA AND ORS.
Adv. SURESH KUMAR KAUSHIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAJJAD AHMAD GANAI AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: FAO/299/2018 – Bala v. Sajjad Ahmad Ganai The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs. 43,49,301 for the death of Rajinder Sharma. The court upheld the tribunal's decision to award 50% compensation to the deceased's second wife (Bimla Sharma) and their daughter, rejecting the legally wedded first wife's (Bala's) claim to sole entitlement. The court held that the Motor Vehicles Act provides beneficial compensation to all dependants whose relationship and dependency are proven, not exclusively to the legally wedded spouse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2018
—
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal
-
26-Apr-2018
Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal
-
25-Jan-2018
Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal
-
18-Jan-2018
Mr. Justice Hari Pal Verma
-
16-Jan-2018
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/299/2018
Case Summary: FAO/299/2018 – Bala v. Sajjad Ahmad Ganai The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs. 43,49,301 for the death of Rajinder Sharma. The court upheld the tribunal's decision to award 50% compensation to the deceased's second wife (Bimla Sharma) and their daughter, rejecting the legally wedded first wife's (Bala's) claim to sole entitlement. The court held that the Motor Vehicles Act provides beneficial compensation to all dependants whose relationship and dependency are proven, not exclusively to the legally wedded spouse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts