JAGPREET SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/38640/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011124962025

Filing Number

CRM-M/59013/2025

Filing Date

18-Jul-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/38640/2025

Registration Date

19-Jul-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGPREET SINGH

    Adv. VIVEK BAGHLA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Jagpreet Singh, a transporter accused of cheating and forgery charges involving ₹2,07,61,898, after he refunded the disputed amount to the complainant company and joined investigation voluntarily. The court made the interim bail order absolute, citing no need for custodial interrogation and the petitioner's cooperation, while imposing conditions including passport submission within one week and a ₹25,000 deposit to an old age home for failing to disclose complete facts initially. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Aug-2025

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

  4. 18-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/38640/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Jagpreet Singh, a transporter accused of cheating and forgery charges involving ₹2,07,61,898, after he refunded the disputed amount to the complainant company and joined investigation voluntarily. The court made the interim bail order absolute, citing no need for custodial interrogation and the petitioner's cooperation, while imposing conditions including passport submission within one week and a ₹25,000 deposit to an old age home for failing to disclose complete facts initially. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case