GARG ELECTRONICS vs STATE OF HARYANA — CWP/20631/2024

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Aug-2024

CNR: PHHC011113662024

e-Filing Number

22-08-2024

Filing Number

CWP/46271/2024

Filing Date

22-Aug-2024

Registration No

CWP/20631/2024

Registration Date

22-Aug-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GARG ELECTRONICS

    Adv. RAM PAL

  2. 2.State of Haryana

  3. 3.Superintendent of Police

  4. 4.Raj Kumar Garg

  5. 5.saroj bala

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.State of Haryana

  3. 3.Superintendent of Police

  4. 4.Raj Kumar Garg

  5. 5.saroj bala

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Garg Electronics as withdrawn on 11.05.2026. The petitioner had deposited the entire amount required by an order dated 23.08.2024 and settled the loan account, though an excess amount was paid. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue separate remedies for recovery of the excess amount paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/20631/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Garg Electronics as withdrawn on 11.05.2026. The petitioner had deposited the entire amount required by an order dated 23.08.2024 and settled the loan account, though an excess amount was paid. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue separate remedies for recovery of the excess amount paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case