GARG ELECTRONICS vs STATE OF HARYANA — CWP/20631/2024

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC011113662024

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

23rd August 2024

e-Filing Number

22-08-2024

Filing Number

CWP/46271/2024

Filing Date

22-08-2024

Registration No

CWP/20631/2024

Registration Date

22-08-2024

Judge

MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI , MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Coram

MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI , MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14

Petitioner(s)

GARG ELECTRONICS

Adv. RAM PAL

State of Haryana

Superintendent of Police

Raj Kumar Garg

saroj bala

Respondent(s)

STATE OF HARYANA

State of Haryana

Superintendent of Police

Raj Kumar Garg

saroj bala

Orders

11-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI,MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Garg Electronics as withdrawn on 11.05.2026. The petitioner had deposited the entire amount required by an order dated 23.08.2024 and settled the loan account, though an excess amount was paid. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue separate remedies for recovery of the excess amount paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Garg Electronics as withdrawn on 11.05.2026. The petitioner had deposited the entire amount required by an order dated 23.08.2024 and settled the loan account, though an excess amount was paid. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue separate remedies for recovery of the excess amount paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case