RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD vs AMANDEEP KAUR AND ORS — FAO/3430/2017
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011109632017
Filing Number
FAO/3430/2017
Filing Date
16-May-2017
Registration No
FAO/3430/2017
Registration Date
17-May-2017
Judge
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Coram
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Category
500.9 - RELIANCE GEN. INSURANCE ( 935 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
Adv. PARAS MONEY GOYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMANDEEP KAUR AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: FAO/3430/2017 Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Amandeep Kaur & Ors. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana partly allowed the insurance company's appeal, modifying the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.84,25,000 to Rs.82,14,000. The court upheld negligence findings but corrected compensation calculation errors: disallowing separate "loss of love and affection" awards (now subsumed in consortium), adjusting the multiplier from 15 to 16 for the 32-year-old deceased, and reducing future prospects from 50% to 40% as per settled law. Critically, amounts already disbursed to claimants were not recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-May-2018
Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan
-
23-May-2018
—
Lok Adalat Bench - 3
-
27-Oct-2017
—
Mr. Justice Darshan Singh
-
18-Jul-2017
—
Mr. Justice Darshan Singh
-
23-May-2017
Mr. Justice Jaspal Singh
-
23-May-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-May-2017
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/3430/2017
Case Summary: FAO/3430/2017 Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Amandeep Kaur & Ors. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana partly allowed the insurance company's appeal, modifying the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.84,25,000 to Rs.82,14,000. The court upheld negligence findings but corrected compensation calculation errors: disallowing separate "loss of love and affection" awards (now subsumed in consortium), adjusting the multiplier from 15 to 16 for the 32-year-old deceased, and reducing future prospects from 50% to 40% as per settled law. Critically, amounts already disbursed to claimants were not recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts