SINGHRAJ vs RAVINDER AND ORS — CR/2975/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011104022021

Filing Number

CR/68524/2021

Filing Date

23-Nov-2021

Registration No

CR/2975/2021

Registration Date

24-Nov-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.6 - ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 (HRY.) ( 537 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SINGHRAJ

    Adv. PRATIBHA YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDER AND ORS

  2. 2.SURENDER THR LRS

  3. 3.BIRENDER

  4. 4.KAMLA

  5. 5.RAJIV

  6. 6.ANITA

  7. 7.ANKIT

  8. 8.ISHIKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas BahlView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed petitioner Singhraj to withdraw his civil revision petition challenging orders dated 25.08.2021 and 12.10.2021 from the trial and appellate courts. The court directed the trial court to decide the main suit afresh after hearing both parties, while disregarding all observations made in the previous interim orders under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC, applying settled law that such interlocutory observations cannot influence final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/2975/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed petitioner Singhraj to withdraw his civil revision petition challenging orders dated 25.08.2021 and 12.10.2021 from the trial and appellate courts. The court directed the trial court to decide the main suit afresh after hearing both parties, while disregarding all observations made in the previous interim orders under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC, applying settled law that such interlocutory observations cannot influence final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case