BIKRAMJIT SINGH ALIAS BIKKAR PANJWAR ALIAS BIKKAR vs NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY — CRA-D/1159/2024
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011098712024
Filing Number
CRA-D/63680/2024
Filing Date
21-Aug-2024
Registration No
CRA-D/1159/2024
Registration Date
27-Aug-2024
Judge
Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur
Coram
Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur
Bench Type
Double
Category
17.81-CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER NIA ACT,2019 SEEKING REGULAR BAILS-GENERAL ( 1423 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIKRAMJIT SINGH ALIAS BIKKAR PANJWAR ALIAS BIKKAR
Adv. ANURAG ARORA
-
2.BIKRAMJIT SINGH @ BIKKAR PANJWAR @ BIKKAR BABA
Respondent(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
-
2.BIKRAMJIT SINGH @ BIKKAR PANJWAR @ BIKKAR BABA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara,mrs. Justice Sukhvinder KaurView PDF
Case Summary: CRA-D/1159/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Bikramjit Singh's bail appeal, finding prima facie evidence of his involvement in a pro-Khalistan terrorist conspiracy including bomb-making, training co-accused members, and planning attacks on political figures and communities. The court emphasized his status as a flight risk, having been extradited from Austria in December 2022, and cited the serious nature of charges under IPC sections and UAPA in denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CRA-D/1159/2024
Case Summary: CRA-D/1159/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Bikramjit Singh's bail appeal, finding prima facie evidence of his involvement in a pro-Khalistan terrorist conspiracy including bomb-making, training co-accused members, and planning attacks on political figures and communities. The court emphasized his status as a flight risk, having been extradited from Austria in December 2022, and cited the serious nature of charges under IPC sections and UAPA in denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts