MANJEET KAUR vs UNION BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER — CWP/22288/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Sep-2022

CNR: PHHC011090952022

Filing Number

CWP/43719/2022

Filing Date

23-Sep-2022

Registration No

CWP/22288/2022

Registration Date

23-Sep-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJEET KAUR

    Adv. DHRUV WALIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/22288/2022 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Manjeet Kaur's writ petition challenging Union Bank of India's SARFAESI proceedings (possession and auction notices) on her Rs. 5.50 lakh housing loan, holding the petition unmaintainable. The court found that the petitioner has adequate alternate remedies under the SARFAESI Act and in the bank's pending civil recovery suit, following Supreme Court precedents establishing that writ jurisdiction is inappropriate for challenging secured asset recovery proceedings when statutory remedies exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Sep-2022

    Other

  4. 23-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/22288/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/22288/2022 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Manjeet Kaur's writ petition challenging Union Bank of India's SARFAESI proceedings (possession and auction notices) on her Rs. 5.50 lakh housing loan, holding the petition unmaintainable. The court found that the petitioner has adequate alternate remedies under the SARFAESI Act and in the bank's pending civil recovery suit, following Supreme Court precedents establishing that writ jurisdiction is inappropriate for challenging secured asset recovery proceedings when statutory remedies exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case