PAWAN KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/19757/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jul-2025

CNR: PHHC011089732025

e-Filing Number

15-07-2025

Filing Number

CWP/42442/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

CWP/19757/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.11 - SERVICE-EDU-HARYANA(SR.EDUCATION DEPT) ( 706 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. JASBIR MOR

  2. 2.Pawan Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Pawan Kumar

  3. 3.Director, Higher Education, Haryana

  4. 4.Haryana Public Service Commission

  5. 5.Anup

  6. 6.Lokesh Kumar

  7. 7.Rakesh Kumar

  8. 8.Hitesh Rathi

  9. 9.Harish Pal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/19757/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Pawan Kumar's petition seeking consideration for the Assistant Professor (History) position (Advertisement 53/2024) in the General Dependents of Ex-Servicemen (DESM) category. The court found that the petitioner scored below the cut-off marks in the General category and therefore was ineligible for selection; additionally, all reserved posts for the General ESM category had already been filled by qualifying ESM candidates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/19757/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/19757/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Pawan Kumar's petition seeking consideration for the Assistant Professor (History) position (Advertisement 53/2024) in the General Dependents of Ex-Servicemen (DESM) category. The court found that the petitioner scored below the cut-off marks in the General category and therefore was ineligible for selection; additionally, all reserved posts for the General ESM category had already been filled by qualifying ESM candidates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case