SATNAM SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. — CWP/7372/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Mar-2018

CNR: PHHC011080032018

Filing Number

CWP/7372/2018

Filing Date

20-Mar-2018

Registration No

CWP/7372/2018

Registration Date

22-Mar-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Bench Type

Single

Category

18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATNAM SINGH

    Adv. ASHOK K. SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of Satnam Singh's writ petition as infructuous on 13.05.2026, finding that both the petitioner and respondent No.4 had expired, rendering the case incapable of implementation. However, the court allowed the petitioner's legal representatives to seek revival of the petition if any grievances remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Nov-2018

    Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  4. 21-Nov-2018

    Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh

  5. 18-Aug-2018

    Mr. Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

  6. 18-Aug-2018

    Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan

  7. 23-Mar-2018

    Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

  8. 23-Mar-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Mar-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/7372/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of Satnam Singh's writ petition as infructuous on 13.05.2026, finding that both the petitioner and respondent No.4 had expired, rendering the case incapable of implementation. However, the court allowed the petitioner's legal representatives to seek revival of the petition if any grievances remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case