RAJINDER SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — RFA/3650/2019

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011075852019

Filing Number

RFA/57164/2019

Filing Date

04-Sep-2019

Registration No

RFA/3650/2019

Registration Date

05-Oct-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

25.4 - RFA (LAND ACQUISITION) HARYANA ( 494 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL-I(RFA) BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJINDER SINGH

    Adv. SANDEEP SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

  2. 2.LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR

  3. 3.HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court partially allowed 15 connected land acquisition appeals filed by Rajinder Singh and other landowners, enhancing the market value of their acquired land in Village Badshahpur, Gurugram from Rs. 4,23,98,904/- per acre to Rs. 4,27,28,000/- per acre. The Court applied 12% cumulative annual appreciation for the 1-year 9-month gap between successive notifications, rejecting simple interest in favor of compound appreciation, and denied interest on delayed appeals while granting all other statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Sep-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/3650/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court partially allowed 15 connected land acquisition appeals filed by Rajinder Singh and other landowners, enhancing the market value of their acquired land in Village Badshahpur, Gurugram from Rs. 4,23,98,904/- per acre to Rs. 4,27,28,000/- per acre. The Court applied 12% cumulative annual appreciation for the 1-year 9-month gap between successive notifications, rejecting simple interest in favor of compound appreciation, and denied interest on delayed appeals while granting all other statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case