PUSHKAR DAHIYA vs RAJNARAYAN KAUSHIK — COCP/2542/2023

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 12, 14. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011057052023

Filing Number

COCP/42458/2023

Filing Date

18-Aug-2023

Registration No

COCP/2542/2023

Registration Date

18-Aug-2023

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 12, 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSHKAR DAHIYA

    Adv. PARVEEN CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJNARAYAN KAUSHIK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Summary: COCP/2542/2023 - Pushkar Dahiya v. Rajnarayan Kaushik The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a contempt petition alleging violation of a 2022 order requiring medical benefits for National Health Mission contractual employees. The court found that the underlying policy decision remains pending before the Government of India and therefore declined to pass further orders, disposing of the petition accordingly while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the matter further if warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/2542/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: COCP/2542/2023 - Pushkar Dahiya v. Rajnarayan Kaushik The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a contempt petition alleging violation of a 2022 order requiring medical benefits for National Health Mission contractual employees. The court found that the underlying policy decision remains pending before the Government of India and therefore declined to pass further orders, disposing of the petition accordingly while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the matter further if warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case