VIVEK vs SUBASH AND ANR — FAO/497/2015

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011049612015

Filing Number

FAO/497/2015

Filing Date

17-Jan-2015

Registration No

FAO/497/2015

Registration Date

17-Jan-2015

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

97.5 - VIRES (GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS) ( 868 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIVEK

    Adv. SANT LAL BARWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBASH AND ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: FAO/497/2015 (VIVEK v. SUBASH CHAND AND ANR.) The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Vivek's appeal against a 2014 Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award, enhancing his compensation from Rs.14,13,009/- to Rs.68,98,009/- (net enhancement of Rs.54,85,000/-). The court corrected the tribunal's errors: applying multiplier 18 instead of 16 for the 18-year-old claimant, reassessing monthly income at Rs.10,000/- with 40% future prospects, and substantially increasing awards for pain/suffering (Rs.15 lakhs), attendant charges (Rs.8 lakhs), and marriage prospects (Rs.5 lakhs), recognizing his 100% disability with quadriparesis. Interest at 9% per annum applies from petition filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2016

    Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari

  4. 15-Mar-2016

    Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari

  5. 15-May-2015

    Mr. Justice K.C. Puri

  6. 17-Jan-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/497/2015

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: FAO/497/2015 (VIVEK v. SUBASH CHAND AND ANR.) The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Vivek's appeal against a 2014 Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award, enhancing his compensation from Rs.14,13,009/- to Rs.68,98,009/- (net enhancement of Rs.54,85,000/-). The court corrected the tribunal's errors: applying multiplier 18 instead of 16 for the 18-year-old claimant, reassessing monthly income at Rs.10,000/- with 40% future prospects, and substantially increasing awards for pain/suffering (Rs.15 lakhs), attendant charges (Rs.8 lakhs), and marriage prospects (Rs.5 lakhs), recognizing his 100% disability with quadriparesis. Interest at 9% per annum applies from petition filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case