SUKHDEV KAUR AND ANR vs ZORA SINGH AND ORS — FAO/386/2016

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Feb-2016

CNR: PHHC011048722016

Filing Number

FAO/386/2016

Filing Date

18-Jan-2016

Registration No

FAO/386/2016

Registration Date

18-Jan-2016

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.1 - NEW INDIA ASSURANCE ( 876 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHDEV KAUR AND ANR

    Adv. PRITPAL SINGH MIGLANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZORA SINGH AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas BahlView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the appeal filed by Sukhdev Kaur and another against Zora Singh and others due to the appellants' non-appearance on multiple hearing dates. The court granted the appellants liberty to revive the appeal if they wished to pursue the case or if any cause remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Aug-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Arun Palli

  4. 13-Dec-2017

    Mrs. Justice Anita Chaudhry

  5. 13-Dec-2017

    —

    Mr Justice Rajiv Sharma

  6. 19-Apr-2017

    —

    Mr Justice Rajiv Sharma

  7. 27-Oct-2016

    —

    Mr. Justice Arun Palli

  8. 21-Jul-2016

    —

    Mr. Justice Arun Palli

  9. 23-Feb-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Jan-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/386/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the appeal filed by Sukhdev Kaur and another against Zora Singh and others due to the appellants' non-appearance on multiple hearing dates. The court granted the appellants liberty to revive the appeal if they wished to pursue the case or if any cause remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case