RITU DEVI AND ANR vs RAVINDER KUMAR AND ORS — FAO/5606/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011046582022

Filing Number

FAO/41899/2022

Filing Date

14-Sep-2022

Registration No

FAO/5606/2022

Registration Date

23-Dec-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Coram

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.31 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 896 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RITU DEVI AND ANR

    Adv. SANJEEV KUMAR PANWAR

  2. 2.HEMANT CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDER KUMAR AND ORS

  2. 2.RAJVINDER KAUR

  3. 3.ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh RathorView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging a MACT award of Rs.27,98,000 in compensation for death caused by motor vehicle accident. The court upheld the tribunal's assessment of the deceased's monthly income at Rs.15,000 (from his manager position), rejecting appellants' unsubstantiated claim of additional agricultural income, and found the compensation calculation consistent with Supreme Court precedents on dependency and conventional heads. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/5606/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging a MACT award of Rs.27,98,000 in compensation for death caused by motor vehicle accident. The court upheld the tribunal's assessment of the deceased's monthly income at Rs.15,000 (from his manager position), rejecting appellants' unsubstantiated claim of additional agricultural income, and found the compensation calculation consistent with Supreme Court precedents on dependency and conventional heads. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case