GURTEJ SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CWP/23127/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Nov-2021

CNR: PHHC011035802021

Filing Number

CWP/38832/2021

Filing Date

02-Nov-2021

Registration No

CWP/23127/2021

Registration Date

12-Nov-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.21 - SERVICE-HARYANA POLICE ( 713 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURTEJ SINGH

    Adv. MOHINDER PAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE HARYANA

  3. 3.THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE HISAR RANGE

  4. 4.DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CUM SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HISAR

  5. 5.THE ENQUIRY OFFICER DEPUTY SUPDT. OF POLICE HISAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh NalwaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without deciding on merits, directing the State of Haryana (Respondent No.2) to decide petitioner's pending revision petition within 4 months. The petitioner challenged adverse ACR remarks and stoppage of 3 annual increments resulting from departmental proceedings, with the State not opposing the direction for timely adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Nov-2021

    Other

  4. 02-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/23127/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without deciding on merits, directing the State of Haryana (Respondent No.2) to decide petitioner's pending revision petition within 4 months. The petitioner challenged adverse ACR remarks and stoppage of 3 annual increments resulting from departmental proceedings, with the State not opposing the direction for timely adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case