M/S IMAGES STUDIO vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CWP/18000/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Aug-2023

CNR: PHHC011033662023

Filing Number

CWP/41509/2023

Filing Date

16-Aug-2023

Registration No

CWP/18000/2023

Registration Date

17-Aug-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.66 - CASE RLT TO REL OF PAY OF WRK DON UND ORD GOVT FUN ( 759 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S IMAGES STUDIO

    Adv. ONKAR SINGH BATALVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.RETURNING OFFICER CUM SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

  3. 3.CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER PUNJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Punjab to release payment to M/S Images Studio for work performed within three months, subject to verification of admitted liability. The court partially granted the petitioner's interest request, imposing 9% per annum interest (instead of the requested 18%) if payment is delayed beyond three months, while allowing the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities regarding any disputed amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Aug-2023

    Other

  4. 16-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/18000/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Punjab to release payment to M/S Images Studio for work performed within three months, subject to verification of admitted liability. The court partially granted the petitioner's interest request, imposing 9% per annum interest (instead of the requested 18%) if payment is delayed beyond three months, while allowing the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities regarding any disputed amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case