PUSHPINDER KAUR AND OTHERS vs MOHINDER KAUR DECEASED THROUGH LRS SAND OTHERS — RSA/3115/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011031602023

Filing Number

RSA/41413/2023

Filing Date

11-Aug-2023

Registration No

RSA/3115/2023

Registration Date

30-Sep-2023

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSHPINDER KAUR AND OTHERS

    Adv. ANKUSH VERMA

  2. 2.GURPARTAP SINGH

  3. 3.ISHWAR PARTAP SINGH

  4. 4.PRABHPREET KAUR

  5. 5.KULWINDER KAUR

  6. 6.BALWINDER KAUR

  7. 7.PRABHJOT KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHINDER KAUR DECEASED THROUGH LRS SAND OTHERS

  2. 2.SITAL SINGH

  3. 3.RAVINDER PAL SINGH

  4. 4.SARABJIT KAUR

  5. 5.SUMANJIT KAUR

  6. 6.SARUP SINGH

  7. 7.BALBIR KAUR

  8. 8.SUKHWINDER KAUR

  9. 9.SURINDER KAUR

  10. 10.AJAY PAL SINGH

  11. 11.INDERJIT KAUR

  12. 12.KAMALJIT KAUR

  13. 13.DALBIR SINGH DECEASED THROUGH LRS RAJINDER KAUR

  14. 14.AMANDEEP SINGH

  15. 15.LOVLEEN KAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA/3115/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed appellants' second appeal seeking partition of an industrial plot. The court upheld concurrent findings that a Family Settlement dated 28.01.2005 had been validly executed and acted upon by all parties, including the appellants' predecessor. The court found appellants presented no error of law or procedure to challenge concurrent findings of fact, and all parties had admitted to signing the settlement, which remained unchallenged for years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/3115/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA/3115/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed appellants' second appeal seeking partition of an industrial plot. The court upheld concurrent findings that a Family Settlement dated 28.01.2005 had been validly executed and acted upon by all parties, including the appellants' predecessor. The court found appellants presented no error of law or procedure to challenge concurrent findings of fact, and all parties had admitted to signing the settlement, which remained unchallenged for years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case