ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INS CO LTD vs KELA DEVI & ORS — FAO/519/2013

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011027452013

Filing Number

FAO/519/2013

Filing Date

11-Feb-2013

Registration No

FAO/519/2013

Registration Date

11-Feb-2013

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.14 - ROYAL SUNDRAM INSURANCE ( 880 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INS CO LTD

    Adv. ASHWANI TALWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KELA DEVI & ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO/519/2013 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company's appeals challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award. The insurance company argued the policy was forged and denied liability, but the court upheld the tribunal's finding that the vehicle was validly insured under the cover note, premium was paid, and the driver held a valid license. The court held both the insurance company and vehicle owner jointly and severally liable to compensate the families for three deaths caused by the insured vehicle's negligent driving. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2014

    Mr. Justice K.kannan

  4. 05-Dec-2013

    Mr. Justice Vijender Singh Malik

  5. 13-May-2013

    Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann

  6. 03-May-2013

    —

  7. 11-Feb-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/519/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO/519/2013 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company's appeals challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award. The insurance company argued the policy was forged and denied liability, but the court upheld the tribunal's finding that the vehicle was validly insured under the cover note, premium was paid, and the driver held a valid license. The court held both the insurance company and vehicle owner jointly and severally liable to compensate the families for three deaths caused by the insured vehicle's negligent driving. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case