M/S VISESA MAINTENCE SERVICE PVT LTD (KNOWN AS JMD MAINTENANCE SERVICES PVT. LTD.) vs ROHIT KUMAR GARG AND ANOTHER — COCP/2882/2020

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011024562020

Filing Number

COCP/60333/2020

Filing Date

09-Dec-2020

Registration No

COCP/2882/2020

Registration Date

22-Dec-2020

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S VISESA MAINTENCE SERVICE PVT LTD (KNOWN AS JMD MAINTENANCE SERVICES PVT. LTD.)

    Adv. Binat Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT KUMAR GARG AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas BahlView PDF

    Summary of COCP/2882/2020 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of Visesa Maintenance Services Pvt. Ltd.'s contempt petition on May 13, 2026, holding that the underlying Civil Revision No. 4030 of 2018 was dismissed in default, causing the interim order to merge with the final order, rendering the contempt petition non-survivable. However, the court granted liberty to the petitioner to revive the case if the default dismissal is found to be incorrect or if the revision petition is restored. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/2882/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of COCP/2882/2020 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of Visesa Maintenance Services Pvt. Ltd.'s contempt petition on May 13, 2026, holding that the underlying Civil Revision No. 4030 of 2018 was dismissed in default, causing the interim order to merge with the final order, rendering the contempt petition non-survivable. However, the court granted liberty to the petitioner to revive the case if the default dismissal is found to be incorrect or if the revision petition is restored. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case