NARESH KUMAR vs SUSHILA DEVI @ SHIV DEVI AND ORS — FAO/2398/2015

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011021322015

Filing Number

FAO/2398/2015

Filing Date

08-Apr-2015

Registration No

FAO/2398/2015

Registration Date

08-Apr-2015

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.26 - APPL FILED BY OWNER AND DRIVER ( 891 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARESH KUMAR

    Adv. K.K.GARG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHILA DEVI @ SHIV DEVI AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas BahlView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Naresh Kumar's appeal due to his non-appearance on multiple dates, with no representation to pursue the case. The court granted liberty to the appellant to revive the appeal if he wishes to continue proceedings or if any cause of action survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2018

    Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu

  4. 13-Nov-2017

    Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan

  5. 19-Jul-2016

    Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta

  6. 19-Jul-2016

    Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta

  7. 19-Jul-2016

    Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta

  8. 19-Jul-2016

    Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta

  9. 14-Jul-2015

    Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan

  10. 10-Apr-2015

    Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan

  11. 08-Apr-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/2398/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Naresh Kumar's appeal due to his non-appearance on multiple dates, with no representation to pursue the case. The court granted liberty to the appellant to revive the appeal if he wishes to continue proceedings or if any cause of action survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case