RAJ ALIAS RAJ GILL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/7196/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: PHHC011021002026

Filing Number

CRWP/48545/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRWP/7196/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

42.1 - CRIMINAL WRIT (HABEAS CORPUS) ( 311 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ ALIAS RAJ GILL

    Adv. ANMOL

  2. 2.RAJ @ RAJ GILL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.RAJ @ RAJ GILL

  3. 3.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) TARN TARAN

  5. 5.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) CITY FEROZEPUR

  6. 6.SUKHWINDER SINGH SANDHU

  7. 7.KARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition after the alleged detenue, Pawandeep Kaur, was produced in court and confirmed that she had not been detained by respondents 5 and 6 (her father and brother) as claimed. The Warrant Officer's report corroborated that she had voluntarily married on 15.05.2026 and was residing with her husband. Finding no detention had occurred, the court disposed of the matter without further directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/7196/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition after the alleged detenue, Pawandeep Kaur, was produced in court and confirmed that she had not been detained by respondents 5 and 6 (her father and brother) as claimed. The Warrant Officer's report corroborated that she had voluntarily married on 15.05.2026 and was residing with her husband. Finding no detention had occurred, the court disposed of the matter without further directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case