MOHIT MALIK AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/7206/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011020492026

Filing Number

CRWP/48528/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRWP/7206/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHIT MALIK AND ANOTHER

    Adv. MOHIT MALIK

  2. 2.MOHIT MALIK

  3. 3.KULDEEP KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.MOHIT MALIK

  3. 3.KULDEEP KUMAR

  4. 4.DSP (Deputy Superintendent of Police) MULLANPUR MOHALI

  5. 5.AMANDEEP SINGH

  6. 6.BALRAJ SINGH

  7. 7.MANAVMEET SINGH

  8. 8.VANITA

  9. 9.MANVIKA

  10. 10.GURDHIAN SINGH

  11. 11.PARMINDER SINGH@MITHU

  12. 12.UNKNOWN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP/7206/2026 Mohit Malik and another filed a petition seeking directions to police authorities (respondent Nos. 2-5) to provide adequate protection to the petitioners, their family members, and employees against illegal acts by private respondents. After arguments, the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedies available under law. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the petition as withdrawn with such liberty, allowing the petitioners to pursue other legal remedies as available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/7206/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP/7206/2026 Mohit Malik and another filed a petition seeking directions to police authorities (respondent Nos. 2-5) to provide adequate protection to the petitioners, their family members, and employees against illegal acts by private respondents. After arguments, the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedies available under law. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the petition as withdrawn with such liberty, allowing the petitioners to pursue other legal remedies as available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case